As bettors we sometimes tend to overcomplicate things I believe. In keeping it as simple as possible, theres merit. With that said, I took a very straightforward strategy and attempted to determine what would happen if we were to wager on every underdog of every tournament. I looked at close to 1200 matches and I did not bet on games were the chances were even or where there was not a underdog with favorable chances. Out of 15 Women’s tournaments should you bet 10 dollars on every underdog you would be up 1288 following those tournaments. Out of 35 men’s tournaments you would be up 3730. I need to return on the results that are mens because I wrote lots of them and a few are chicken scratch. So some amounts are away but I often consider at maximum its a -10% gross. In any case, the piece of research I did concluded that gambling on all underdogs in every tournament could yield roughly 8-10%. When most bettors arent content with this kind of yield I personally would be content with a guaranteed way to make money. This system isn’t perfect and sick should go over again and examine more tourneys and then place each of the men’s matches in a dictionary such as I did to the girls but I think strict adherence to my view will yield positive results in the long run. What are your guys thoughts? Anyone have any experience with this or similar plans? Additionally, for what its worth tracked 4 months of Nfl from 2014 and you would also be convinced if you went with the most underdog strat. Certainly 4 months does not imply anything but I think its worth looking at. Thank you for looking.
Edit: okay I calculated 30 more tourneys. I required the outcomes in 2012 and 2013 and chose 15 distinct tourneys. You would wind up 1125, if you bet during 2012 on each underdog in those tourneys. If you wager 10 on every underdog in 2013 you’ll wind up 995.3 throughout this interval.