Our partners utilize technologies, like cookies, and accumulate surfing data to personalise the content and advertising shown for you and to supply you with the best internet experience.
Please let us know if you agree.
By Simon Stone
BBC Sport in Geneva
What was intended to be a meeting on the path to major reform in European soccer stopped with announcements about discussions and deadlines which had been extended for another 18 weeks on Tuesday afternoon in Geneva.
It was not what the European Institution’ Association (ECA) had envisaged when they met at Malta summer time. They expected, this week they’d be finalising adjustments which could be passed for rubber of their beginning in 2024.
The measure of the issues ECA chairman Andrea Agnelli and his coworkers are confronting was emphasised in conversations off from their main press conference. The tone differed slightly depending on who was speaking but the message has been approximately the same. Forget Plan A. Plan B is mandatory however, in this phase, nobody is completely certain what that ought to be.
Agnelli attempted to handle the situation but also the Juventus chairman, generally so rested, had no answers.
It was quite unsatisfactory and a 35-minute closing press conference came into a fittingly terse ending when Agnelli was asked whether it was true he’d inquired the national leagues for a decrease in the number.
“No, no,” he said, climbing to his feet, until responding’no’ again when he asked if he’d ever mentioned it.
Agnelli and the ECA consider an overwhelming majority of the member clubs want reform of European contest.
The proposal was for three competitions, each with group phases containing four classes of eight nightclubs. Also, the idea was to get relegation and promotion between competitions.
It was not made clear where the match dates eight over the present system – could emerge from. However, it was envisaged the fluctuations would create TV earnings that is increased and extend European rivalry, both in regard to the number of clubs involved along with the matches they playedwith.
Immediately, their opposition was declared by some voices. Even the Premier League clubs released their announcement that was collective, and clubs made their feelings known.
ECA personnel have spent the past three months trying to find common ground that would allow the formulation of a plan that may be carried forward. It has become more and more evident this is nearly impossible.
“The proposal will be in the interests of and it is a fantastic proposal,” explained Agnelli. “Will this be the one that arrives first at the finishing line? It might not be.”
Although no-one said it publicly, in private, the blame for the current impasse has been credited to the big five leagues of Europe, from Germany, Spain, Italy, France and also England.
The feeling is those leagues are somewhat more concerned about protecting their profitable national TV markets in any erosion brought on by the growth of the European game, than they’re about the improvement of the continent as a whole.
One club executive from a large state that is middle-ranking told BBC Sport he had no issue with England’s most important nightclubs, nor the Premier League as a complete given fascination that is historic and its validity. He questioned Italy’s sixth best club must benefit from huge TV revenues, some of which came out of his own nation, while the finances of his club had been decreasing.
“The attractive we are, the fewer people wish to come to our games and the quicker our players wish to depart for nightclubs in other nations,” he said.
“The big leagues are only considering themselves. They do not care about European contest. For all of us, it is about European competition. That is the point where the interest will be.”
It is the self-centred interests of these big championships Edwin van der Sar was speaking about when the former Netherlands and Manchester United goalkeeper, today building an impressive reputation as chief executive in Ajax, was talking about when he said of the past 3 weeks:”There has been plenty of proposals and feedback from other stakeholders – some relevant, some untrue and irrelevant, which is strange.”
“In the very top, some things need tweaking,” stated former Crystal Palace midfielder Aki Riihalahti, now chief executive in Finland’s most famous team HJK Helsinki. “At the other end, I have rarely seen such agreement. Change is required.”
The problem is the first proposals were announced with fanfare, an element of wariness has been introduced within the process of knocking them back.
Despite numerous sources saying that initial idea is’dead’, at least one delegate in Switzerland has taken a view which he will not think a notion he believed would have’disastrous’ consequences for the national league his club plays in has gone off, before an alternate plan was imposed.
Suggestions that have been floated around the edges of talks in Geneva this week have included a yield to the second group stage of the Champions League, which was abolished following four seasons in 2003.
Thoughts will be taken on board or discarded, with Agnelli stating when Uefa must go in the marketplace for the TV rights cycle that runs from 40, as that’s the deadline for change is 2022.
Though clubs were warned by Agnelli not the odds are on a group of smaller fluctuations, taking place over a longer time period, to revise the European football landscape.
“We won’t get past an 80% satisfaction rate,” he said.
“You must not forget , the ECA is there to guard the promotion of football across all European nations, not simply a few who’ve been a bit more vocal in recent months.”
Presenting the couples who Intend to dance their way
Get headlines and latest scores delivered to your phone, and also learn where to find us on online.